Sometimes, it takes more energy planning than it does to abide by the set ideas simply. So, when it comes to employee benefits and compensation, it’s important to remember that the medicine should not be worse than the cure.
Cafeteria plans have benefited employees and their organisations for decades but have come under scrutiny as of late. That is, these schemes operate differently from how they were supposed to, according to many industries and companies.
But what went wrong? What we’d like to understand is why these schemes no longer work in the way that they had originally been intended.
These come under numerous categories and titles, depending on where you are from, but employee cafeteria plans effectively benefit schemes.
Salaries, on one hand, are taxable, whereas certain forms of compensation are not, or are heavily discounted. By selecting these, employees can opt for using such benefits which allow both the individual and the employer to be spared from having to pay certain income taxes.
They all started in the 1980s, and have been a mainstay in the US, listed as Section 125 plans. Of course, these have other names in different countries. The cafeteria plan usually allows staff to choose from an assortment of pre-tax benefits, such as group-term life insurance, a sports club membership or health insurance.
Today, the benefits can also be company cars, travel vouchers, eyeglasses, funding for medical expenses and more. The main feature of these programmes are the tax advantages for the business and their employee. Cafeteria plan benefits also often included eligible qualified benefits like coverage of dependent-care expenses and retirement plans. It was especially popular in the United States, where many people wanted to use the pre-tax money for health insurance premiums and health savings accounts.
Cafeteria plans, foremost, have allowed workers to divert a portion of their pre-tax salary for fringe benefits. This results in less official income from which they must pay taxes.
It’s hard to argue against tax relief. After all, any financial benefits are sure to bring value to anyone’s wallet. In many cases, employees select flexible spending arrangements, as part of their pre-tax premium conversion plans.
Oftentimes, workers also opt for a full-flex plan, which provides a menu of options from which they would otherwise pay externally. This list of benefits includes multiple insurance providers, coverages, cash reimbursements, or vacation days.
When reviewing the advantages and disadvantages of a cafeteria plan, it’s also essential to remember to honour the universality principle. In this case, such schemes should not discriminate in benefits, contributions, or eligibility. Though, with all the supposed accessibility, these plans have grown to become a double-edged sword.
Let’s find out why this is the case.
Times have effectively changed. The working environments of the 1980s or 1990s no longer abide by the same arrangements. For instance, many employees can select full-time contractual work, but it is increasingly being supplanted by part-time or per-project basis arrangements.
With that said, many individuals are de-facto employees but may still find themselves disqualified from company benefits. Thus, they can be ineligible for cafeteria plans, as companies can only offer them to full employees.
That means that while one employee will be able to make full use of the cafeteria plan to cover his medical expenses, or to fund group-term life insurance, those who are not employed on a proper full-time contract will not be able to do so. Such a situation can seem unfair to those not using cafeteria plans.
Another reason for the loss of popularity of cafeteria plans can be, for example, the commuter benefits - they may have been popular before the pandemic, but dropped in popularity, as more people now prefer to work from the comfort of their own homes. The pandemic has made it clear that employees have a whole spectrum of different needs and preferences that a single cafeteria plan can't simply match. For some people, health benefits are the most significant, while others will find the dependent daycare financing more important. There is no way to find a cafeteria plan that will be fit for everyone.
Another aspect that gives reason for the diminishing appeal is the fine print. In some cases, beneficiaries may find themselves to be inconvenienced because the arrangements apply only for a limited time, with blackout dates or extended grace periods for medical coverage.
It is well known that people dislike hidden costs and if they receive benefits, they do not want to be surprised with
Financials are a significant pain point as workers become increasingly wary of the hidden conditions of ‘freemium’ products. This entails purchasing at low initial fees, before subjecting to unanticipated costs, which are necessary for activating the service, to make it usable. Out-of-pocket expenses for services within such plans have become significant drawbacks - leading to workers increasingly turning away from them.
The sheer administrative complexity has rendered many plans inflexible and incompatible with the changing requirements of the employee. By combining broad fringe benefits, most employees are locked into their cafeteria plan for an entire year.
Compliance issues with 3rd party vendors can also add unexpected complexity to a cafeteria plan. When personal circumstances change, such as medical emergency, or childbirth, many agreed-to conditions could suddenly become invalid. Through such examples, it becomes apparent that many benefit schemes fail to reflect the day-to-day realities of the plan’s beneficiary.
Businesses must communicate updates and changes to benefit schemes, which includes a summary plan description. The challenge will be to remain on top of each component and notify users immediately, requiring a continuous commitment on the part of the employer. Applying this diligence requires resources, and transparency, which can overwhelm an organisation.
The competitiveness of a well-functioning cafeteria plan results in significant costs for companies, which could severely impact revenues. As such, it may also require more financial liquidity for businesses.
Whilst a cafeteria plan can create benefits for both the employer and the employee in the short to medium term, the complexities and limitations can far outweigh the system's benefits. A flexible benefits plan is a great thing in theory but like everything else tax-related has to be implemented with caution.
Firstly, it’s important to note that employees are also capable of making poor choices, due to a lack of experience with terms and conditions. To their detriment, this can lead workers to find themselves without cover for predictable emergencies. Whilst perfectly in the right of the company, the dissatisfaction can nevertheless lead to a negative public opinion.
Your company can mitigate increased administrative burdens by conducting a self-evaluation of whether the organisation is experienced enough to even consider offering cafeteria plans. Those better-equipped organisations should offer a better capacity to commit resources to maintain communications and a higher quality of services. Those that struggle to provide committed service, should refrain from offering benefits to their employees.
In this age of greater flexibility and worker demands, users are accustomed to tailoring products to their lives. For this reason, workers only seek out the benefits they will use. Employees simply need to take this into account. As with any such system, the same is true here: quality will always beat quantity. Use this principle to your advantage now.
While introducing continuous employee training programme requires investment in time and capital, its advantages can easily outshine the problems. Discover the benefits of long-term employee development.
Discover which employee benefits can help your company succeed by luring top people and keeping them on board.
Improve your workplace buddy system to help new hires and their buddies, speed up onboarding, and bring more value to the business.